Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi-Fi 6E Router Overview vs RAXE500

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi-Fi 6E Router Review vs RAXE500

Sharing is displaying curiosity!

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi-Fi 6E Router Evaluation Rating

Summary

The Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 is an excellent router at a far more partaking price than its huge brother, the RAXE500. Most prospects are unlikely to see a distinction in effectivity and as a consequence of this truth this makes it a larger buy.

profit

  • Fantastic price-performance ratio
  • Fantastic effectivity and fluctuate with 5Ghz @ 160Mhz
  • 6Ghz should guarantee 160Mhz channel width and multigigabit throughput

Cons

  • Some preliminary factors with setup
  • 6Ghz lacks the fluctuate as compared with 5Ghz

Earlier throughout the yr, I reviewed Netgear’s new WiFi 6E flagship gaming router, the RAXE500. This new experience is being utilized in further fairly priced fashions, and I was not too way back reviewing the model new RAXE300.

Netgear RAXE300 vs. RAXE500 Specification

To keep away from losing you from having to judge the desk beneath, the RAXE300 is simply a stripped down mannequin of the RAXE500. However, till you’re using this in a crowded particular person setting, I doubt you’ll ever uncover the excellence.

The number of obtainable bands for every 2.5 Ghz and 6 Ghz has been decreased to 2×2. This might solely affect you if in case you’ve gotten many models transferring a substantial quantity of information on each band at any given time. 6GHz WiFi stays to be very unusual and has extreme throughput, so it would take a fairly demanding and peculiar scenario for this to have a difficulty.

It’s unlikely that we’ll see the discharge of 4×4 shopper chips, however after they did, this might make an enormous distinction from the sooner assertion.

If one thing, I would say that WAN hyperlink aggregation may have a better real-world impression than lack of bands.

Netgear has moreover barely modified the multigigabit port and WAN ports. You now have two ports which will act as LAN or WAN, one 1G and the other 2.5G. Throughout the UK you’ll most likely want to stay to 1G as your WAN port after which 2.5G for LAN.

Totally different minor variations embrace dropping a USB port and altering it to USB-C. I found this pretty inconvenient as most USB drives and exterior exhausting drives nonetheless use USB-A, so you want an adapter or hub. So the RAXE300 is now fanless, although I not at all heard the fan on the RAXE500.

netgear RAXE300 RAXE500
wifi experience Triband AXE7800 Triband AXE11000
first band 2.4GHz 2×2 Wi-Fi 6
As a lot as 574Mbps
(20/40MHz)
2.4GHz 4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As a lot as 1148Mbps
(20/40MHz)
Second Band 5GHz 4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As a lot as 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
5GHz 4×4 Wi-Fi 6
As a lot as 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
Third Band 6GHz 2×2 Wi-Fi 6E
As a lot as 2402Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
6GHz 4×4 Wi-Fi 6E
As a lot as 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
Backward Compatibility 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
AP-mode Certain Certain
Gigabit group port 4x LAN, 1x WAN/WAN 4x LAN, 1x WAN/LAN
multi-gigabit group port 1 LAN/WAN 2.5Gbps 1 LAN/WAN 2.5Gbps
LAN Hyperlink Aggregation Certain
(LAN3 and LAN4)
Certain
(LAN3 and LAN4)
WAN Hyperlink Aggregation Nope Certain (WAN + LAN1)
dual-WAN Nope Certain (WAN+LAN1/2.5Gbps)
USB 1x USB 3.0 (USB-C) 2x USB 3.0 (USB-A)
processing vitality 1.7GHz quad-core CPU,
256MB Flash, 512MB RAM
1.8GHz 64-bit processor
512MB Flash, 1GB RAM
Dimensions 11.86 x 8.16 x 3.23 inches
(30.13 x 20.79 x 8.2cm)
11.7 x 8.3 x 3.07 inches
(29.8 x 21.1 x 7.8cm)
Weight 2.23lbs (1.01kg) 3.2lbs (1.45kg)

Prepare

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi-Fi 6E Router Review vs RAXE500 1661916174 248 Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi Fi 6E Router Review vs RAXE500.webp

Chances are you’ll configure it by the use of the Nighthawk app or the web interface. In case you try and do it by the use of the web, Netgear is pretty forceful in attempting to get you to utilize the app, nevertheless there’s a hyperlink on the bottom of the online web page that takes you to the web settings.

I had some minor setup factors with this router, I’m guessing it was a mix of particular person error and my tousled group setup.

For a lot of testing, I mix the router inside my common group and the Netgear routers will then change to 10.0.0.1 to steer clear of IP conflicts.

After I test effectivity with my server, I modify to entry degree mode.

Points appeared to work at first nevertheless when switching to entry degree mode the 6Ghz group failed. I moreover had intermittent factors with the WiFi slicing out intermittently. This led me down a path the place each little factor breaks. After I rebooted the router, I couldn’t even get it to hook up with the online.

In the end, after my 3dr reboot, each little factor merely labored. I’m pretty constructive there’s one factor else on my group that prompted this problem, nevertheless I felt it was essential to highlight it in case anyone else experiences associated factors.

Wi-Fi 6E 6Ghz Effectivity

I examined the speeds in three areas:

  • Office using my office PC with WiFi 6E PCIe card
  • Ground flooring lounge with Huawei Matebook 14 and Pixel 6
  • Entrance room, two rooms previous the lounge, using Huawei Matepad 14 and Pixel 6

With iPerf3 on the laptop computer pc, I managed to:

  • Office: 1.47 Gbits/sec.
  • Entrance room: 798 Mbit/s
  • Entrance room: 212 Mbit/s

Using the Group SpeedTest app on an UnRAID server, my Pixel 6 achieved:

  • Office: 1.39 Gbits/sec.
  • Entrance room: 1001 Mbit/s
  • Entrance room: 351 Mbit/s

With the default settings, I didn’t get very good effectivity with 6Ghz. Dwelling home windows would current a connection tempo of spherical 1.4 Gbps. Experimenting with utterly totally different channels yielded considerably higher outcomes and I ended up deciding on channel 85.

In the end I was able to be part of at 2.4Gbps and iPerf speeds had been 1.47Gbits/sec which was a fraction of decrease than 5Ghz at 160Mhz.

File transfers had been among the many best I’ve seen over WiFi. When transferring a giant ZIP file, I was able to persistently get 192 MB/s which is the same as 1536 Mbps.

As anticipated for 6Ghz, the signal prime quality drops faster than 5Ghz. After I attempted this in my storage/well being membership driveway, I couldn’t see 6Ghz, whereas every 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz had been seen and sensible. Effectivity was moreover lower than the RAXE500 after I examined the fluctuate on that.

WiFi 6 5Ghz effectivity

iPerf

  • Office: 1.50 Gbits/sec.
  • Entrance room: 901 Mbit/s
  • Entrance room: 433 Mbit/s

pixel 6

  • Office: 1.41 Gbits/sec.
  • Entrance room: 956 Mbit/s
  • Entrance room: 618 Mbit/s
  • Storage: 73 Mbit/s

Beforehand, I’ve had some drawback getting Netgear routers to establish a safe 160 MHz large connection. Nonetheless, in all my newest evaluations, they’ve labored correct out of the sphere with no factors.

5Ghz effectivity was flawless all through my exams, and speeds hold extreme as a result of the fluctuate will enhance. This reduces the enchantment of WiFi 6E and 6Ghz a bit, nevertheless I dwell in a semi-detached dwelling in a seaside metropolis. In case you dwell in a flat in a metropolis or near an airport/radar, you’ll have additional points with 160Mhz.

The fluctuate was distinctive, with the router positioned in my office, which is the hub of my residence, I was able to get fantastic speeds at all times. As loads as you might get obsessed with mesh strategies, having an trustworthy router like this, optimally positioned all through the residence, would possibly most likely current superior effectivity for a decrease value.

2.4GHz effectivity

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi-Fi 6E Router Review vs RAXE500 1661916174 909 Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300 Wi Fi 6E Router Review vs RAXE500.webp

Pixel 6 and iPerf outcomes on the laptop computer pc had been virtually an an identical

  • Office: 214 Mbits/sec
  • Entrance room: 72Mbit/s
  • Entrance room: 31 Mbit/s

Wi-Fi 5 5Ghz

Many models will proceed to utilize the earlier Wi-Fi customary and effectivity stays to be good proper right here. Dwelling home windows connects on essentially the most tempo of 1.7 Gbps

  • Office: 1.2 Gbits/sec.
  • Lounge: 829 Mbits/sec.
  • Entrance room: 301 Mbits/sec.

As quickly as as soon as extra, the outcomes had been glorious. On this case, among the many highest I’ve seen on WiFi 5. However, attempting once more at my earlier evaluations, that’s seemingly on account of that they had been working at 80Mhz, not 160Mhz.

Router Choices

To my information, Netgear retains the firmware choices an an identical on all of these Nighthawk routers, and the general choices are the an identical as a result of the RAXE500.

It has all the essential choices, nevertheless if in case you’ve gotten granular administration over each little factor and a great deal of choices, you may uncover this disappointing.

Like all totally different Netgear routers and mesh strategies, this comprises Netgear Armor, and likewise you get a free month with it. It’s a paid service that seems pretty pricey to me, nevertheless it’s a useful service if in case you’ve gotten a giant family of individuals that’s most likely not very adept at determining and avoiding potential cyber security risks.

Value and totally different decisions

The Netgear RAXE300 is available on the market from Amazon US for $399.99 and Amazon UK for £376.86, although it isn’t presently obtainable.

The Netgear RAXE300 is simply not however obtainable from the Netgear retailer, nevertheless the RAXE500 is £550.

Then you should have the ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 for £478.99.

Frequent

Most residence prospects can ignore the RAXE500, it’s a large router, nevertheless it’s unlikely that it will be able to push it to the limit.

The Netgear RAXE300 will current a just about an an identical experience nevertheless for nearly £200 a lot much less. It must be larger than passable for any demanding residence scenario and even any small enterprise that needs to take advantage of the speeds that WiFi 6E brings.

As a result of the fluctuate of this router is great, it’s pretty partaking over mesh strategies. As long as you presumably can centrally place it, it has the potential to outperform a mesh system, and for a lot much less money.

With this router, I expert some teething points. I really feel that’s particular person error and my difficult group, though most likely the router itself because it’s new to the market.

x